🔍 Read the full analysis: How To Understand AI’s Role In Wage Setting on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on monitors, keyboards and dev gear
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
A November 13 essay from ThorstenMeyerAI.com examines how wages are set, using Germany’s minimum-wage increase and economic history to frame the issue. It cites a study finding an AI assistant increased customer-support agents’ issues resolved per hour by 15% on average, but says productivity gains do not automatically determine pay.
ThorstenMeyerAI.com published an explainer on November 13 examining who sets wages and whether workers will share in productivity gains from artificial intelligence. The essay points to Germany’s minimum-wage increase to €13.90 an hour on January 1, 2026, and a study it cites in which an AI assistant raised customer-support agents’ issues resolved per hour by 15% on average. Higher output, the article argues, does not by itself establish that workers’ pay will rise.
The article says about six million people in Germany received a raise when the legal minimum wage increased from €12.82 to €13.90 an hour at the start of 2026. It describes the increase as the first of two steps and attributes the process to Germany’s Minimum Wage Commission: a chair, three union representatives and three employer representatives have voting roles, while two academics advise without voting. The government made the proposal binding by regulation.
To explain why productivity and pay can diverge, the essay traces several economic arguments. Adam Smith wrote in 1776 that wages arise from a bargain between workers and employers with different interests, and that employers often have greater ability to wait. John Bates Clark’s 1899 account of the marginal product offered a market benchmark: in a market without friction, a worker’s pay would reflect the additional output their work creates. The essay stresses Clark’s qualification that this result depends on conditions without friction.
The article also cites research on Germany’s 2015 minimum wage, saying it affected 15% of employees, increased their pay and did not reduce employment, according to a study published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Separately, it reports that an AI assistant increased customer-support agents’ issues resolved per hour by 15% on average. That is a productivity measure, not evidence in itself of a corresponding wage increase.
Infographic 01 · The number to remember
73.5%: where Germany's income goes
The labour share: pay for employees as a share of national income.
Out of every €100 of German national income, 2025
Labour share, Germany · % of national income
The share rose in 2024 and 2025 partly because company and investment income fell in a weak economy while pay kept rising (IW). A higher share is not automatically good news. Definitions matter: measured against GDP, or with the self-employed counted differently, labour shares come out differently.
Sources: Destatis, key national accounts aggregates (as of 30 Sep 2026); M. Grömling, IW-Kurzbericht 20/2026 (12 Mar 2026).
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Who Receives AI Productivity Gains
The question matters to workers and employers because more output does not automatically mean higher pay. As the essay lays out, wages can be shaped by employers’ pay decisions, the supply of workers and demand for their skills, collective bargaining, and legal wage floors. When AI helps an employee complete more work, the division of the resulting value remains a matter of workplace arrangements and bargaining power, not simply a mechanical calculation.
For readers, that distinction helps separate a claim about efficiency from a claim about wages. The cited 15% figure concerns issues resolved per hour among customer-support agents; it does not establish whether their pay changed, how any gains were distributed, or whether the result applies to other jobs. Germany’s minimum-wage example shows another route to pay changes: a commission recommends a level and the government gives it legal force.
Popular right now

Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C Charging, IPX4, Black

Shark WANDVAC Power PET Cordless Handheld Vacuum, White, WV410WH

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen), Wireless Noise-Cancelling Earbuds with Immersive Audio and Wireless Charging Case, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Wage Bargains to Legal Floors
The essay sets today’s debate against a long-running dispute about how workers should be paid. Smith’s account emphasized negotiation between parties with unequal ability to wait. David Ricardo later argued that wages tended toward a level needed for workers to subsist, while Clark framed pay through the additional output produced by a worker. These are historical theories, not direct measurements of how every modern workplace sets wages.
Governments have also established wage floors. The article points to Australia’s 1907 Harvester judgment, the United States’ 1938 federal minimum-wage law, and Germany’s introduction of a general minimum wage in 2015. In Germany, it says, the statutory floor began at €8.50 an hour, following a system in which unions and employers had set pay largely by sector. These examples show that wage-setting can combine market forces with bargaining and public rules.
Another measure in the essay is the labour share: the portion of national income paid to employees as wages, salaries and employers’ social contributions. It gives Germany’s labour share as 73.5% in 2025. That figure describes a national-income distribution for the stated year; it does not reveal how much a particular worker earned or how AI affected their pay.
““The workmen desire to get as much, the masters to give as little, as possible.””
— Adam Smith, as quoted in the ThorstenMeyerAI.com essay
What the Productivity Figures Cannot Show
The cited customer-support study reports a 15% average increase in issues resolved per hour, but the supplied article does not identify the study’s researchers, publication date, sample size or workplace conditions. It also does not say whether agents’ wages changed, whether the extra output affected staffing, or how employers and workers divided any financial gains. The result should not be read as a forecast for every occupation or AI system.
The essay’s account of Germany’s minimum-wage increase gives the commission’s composition and the new hourly rate, but the material provided does not identify the second step’s amount or effective date. The national labour-share figure likewise gives no information on how income is distributed among different workers. Those gaps limit what can be concluded about the effect of AI or policy on any individual’s pay.
Pay Outcomes Depend on Negotiation
The next developments to watch are whether employers that adopt AI change wages, staffing levels or job responsibilities, and whether workers gain a role in negotiating how productivity improvements are shared. Evidence from workplaces over time would be needed to distinguish higher output from higher compensation and to determine whether effects vary by occupation.
For Germany, the second stage of the minimum-wage increase is another point to track, although the supplied source does not specify its timing or level. The broader question raised by the essay remains open: when technology helps workers produce more, who receives the added value will depend on bargaining, market conditions and public rules.
Key Questions
What happened to Germany’s minimum wage in 2026?
The ThorstenMeyerAI.com essay says the legal minimum wage rose from €12.82 to €13.90 an hour on January 1, 2026. It describes this as the first of two steps.
Does the 15% AI productivity figure mean workers earned 15% more?
No. The figure cited refers to issues resolved per hour by customer-support agents using an AI assistant. The supplied material does not report a wage increase.
Who decides Germany’s minimum wage?
According to the essay, Germany’s Minimum Wage Commission makes a proposal, with voting members representing unions and employers and academics serving in advisory roles. The government makes the rate binding by regulation.
What does the labour share measure?
It measures the portion of national income paid to employees through wages, salaries and employers’ social contributions. The essay gives Germany’s labour share as 73.5% in 2025; it is not an individual wage measure.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
